Drop a stale README claim — the bridge is wired into the player

The "not done yet" list still said the player does not load st-bridge.js or
honour ?platform=brightsign. Both landed in ce854ff. Replaced with what is
actually outstanding: nothing server-side consumes the bs_* fields the player
now reports.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uaeo9MvzKoyXuN6ZsbhtkL
This commit is contained in:
ScreenTinker 2026-08-04 21:28:07 -05:00
parent 7fb94fbf70
commit bc68cd2752

View file

@ -90,11 +90,9 @@ A player paired before this port is still recognised, by its BrightSign user age
Stated plainly so nobody reads this as finished:
- **`offline.html` is not written.** The host references it as the fallback page.
- **The player does not yet load `st-bridge.js` or honour `?platform=brightsign`.** The bridge and
the resolver exist and are tested; wiring them into `index.html` (identity, restart-instead-of-
reload, sync backend) is the next commit.
- **No server-side plumbing**: no `sync_backend` column, no dashboard control, nothing sends
`set-sync-backend` down. The resolver is ready for it.
`set-sync-backend` down, and nothing consumes the `bs_model` / `bs_serial` / `bs_screen` fields
the player now reports. The resolver is ready for all of it.
- **The `brightsign` backend is a resolved decision, not yet an implementation.** The API is now
known (it was not in the MCP doc set — `part-6-appendices/api-reference.md` is a stub — but
`docs.brightsign.biz/developers/syncmanager` and the `brightsign/dev-cookbook`