Node 22 added a built-in `navigator` global, defined as a getter with no
setter. The test's shim assigned to it, which throws "only a getter" under
'use strict' on 22 while being a normal assignment on Node 20, where the global
does not exist at all. It is configurable, so define it instead of assigning.
Defining it unconditionally is also the better fixture: Node 22's own navigator
reports the HOST locale, so a test reading its language would otherwise depend
on the machine or CI runner it happens to run on.
This was the single failure in an otherwise clean Node 22 run (1639/1640 with
better-sqlite3 12.9.0), and it is confined to test code — no production server
or frontend file assigns to globalThis.navigator.
1649/1649 on Node 20.
"Default Content" is persisted by the device route, snapshotted and restored by the settings layer,
offered in the device form in five languages — and read by nothing. Grep the whole tree and it
appears only in those places, the schema, and this checklist. It is absent from assemblePayload,
from every socket payload, and from all four players.
Counting it as "content assigned" therefore told the operator their screen was set up while the
screen itself went on showing "waiting for content" — the checklist confirming the one thing it
exists to confirm, incorrectly. It now counts only a playlist or a layout, both of which really do
put something on a display.
An existing test asserted the opposite ("any of the three ways of assigning counts"). It encoded the
same false premise, so it is replaced by one that pins the corrected behaviour along with the
evidence for it. The column and the form field are left alone — whether to implement or remove the
feature is a product decision, and this change only stops the checklist making a claim on its
behalf.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uaeo9MvzKoyXuN6ZsbhtkL
A user reported not knowing how to get content onto a screen. There was already
onboarding — a modal wizard — but it is gated on a localStorage flag: skip it
once and it never comes back, and it never knew whether you succeeded at
anything. Someone who closed it was left with no thread to pull, which is
exactly what was described.
A second tour would repeat that mistake. Tours are dismissed and forgotten, and
they describe the product rather than the account. This is a checklist on the
dashboard that reads real state, so it cannot claim you have done something you
have not, it is still there tomorrow, and it names the one thing to do next
rather than everything the product can do.
The steps are the shortest true path to a screen showing something: connect a
screen, add content, put it in a playlist, send it to the screen. Only the last
one cannot be satisfied by creating an object and walking away — a screen has to
actually be pointed at something — so an account full of playlists with nothing
playing is correctly reported as unfinished, which is the failure that was
reported. Steps stay in dependency order, so nobody is sent to a page they
cannot use yet.
It disappears on its own once the first screen is live and can be hidden before
then, so it never nags someone who already knows the product. Once hidden or
finished it costs no extra request at all.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uaeo9MvzKoyXuN6ZsbhtkL
