mirror of
https://github.com/screentinker/screentinker.git
synced 2026-08-13 22:03:13 -06:00
6 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ScreenTinker
|
5fa6b2d07d |
A baseline moves when the fix reaches SCREENS, which is not one rule
Two changes that are really one idea: the parity model treated all four
players as if they update the same way, and they do not.
WEB AND BRIGHTSIGN GET audio.volume BACK.
The audit removed it because v1.9.28's index.html contained the string
set_volume zero times, and because the handler read payload.value while the
dashboard sends { level }. The second reason 1.9.31 fixed. The first was
reasoning from the wrong artifact: this player is SERVED BY THE SERVER, so a
browser panel runs whatever build is answering it, not the release its row was
created under. There is no browser panel stuck on the v1.9.28 player once the
server moves — and prod moved tonight. The slider works on those displays right
now while the baseline says it does not, so the dashboard is hiding a working
control from every display that declares nothing.
BrightSign comes with it, on the same served player. The unit-specific doubt is
whether a hwz player's media element is reachable at all — and that is already
answered by audio.mute, which this baseline has always claimed: set_volume
reaches setMediaVolume() and device:mute-changed reaches currentVideoEl.muted,
same element, same path. If hwz swallowed one it would swallow both.
TIZEN DOES NOT COME WITH THEM, AND THE TEST NOW KNOWS WHY.
A .wgt sits on the panel until somebody updates it. Cutting 1.9.31 put nothing
on any screen, so an un-updated Tizen panel still has the broken handler and
moving its baseline would resurrect the dead slider on real hardware.
The test could not express that. It judged every family against "shipped
source", resolved as the newest tag — which is HEAD on a release commit, so
tagging 1.9.31 flipped all four biconditionals at once and demanded a baseline
change for displays that cannot have the fix yet. Green tree, red build, naming
a baseline, with nothing in the diff to explain it. main would have gone red on
the next commit whatever it contained; #242 just got there first.
So the two families are now modelled separately. Server-served: judged against
the working tree, both directions, because both are decidable from the build we
are about to serve. Device artifact: judged against the previous release, and
only in the over-claim direction — "the baseline claims it, so the shipped
player had better implement it" is always true and worth failing on, while
"HEAD gained the handler, so add it" is a guess about how many panels have
updated. The cost is that a stale entry can outlive the artifact reaching the
fleet; that is a judgement about screens, so a person makes it in
player-capabilities.js and records why.
player-capabilities.test.js carried the same stale reasoning hardcoded, and
docs/player-parity.md stated the old facts in four places — a parity matrix
that lies being the exact failure this whole model exists to stop.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014skWYXJUWhF73EvNPgB2AS
|
||
|
ScreenTinker
|
b29e3b4676 |
Judge the baselines against the PREVIOUS release, not the newest tag
Cutting 1.9.31 turned a green tree red, and the failing assertion named a baseline rather than the tag that caused it. "Shipped source" was resolved as the newest v* tag. That is wrong at exactly one moment, and it is a moment that arrives at every release: on the release commit the newest tag IS HEAD, so shipped source becomes the working tree, every biconditional inverts, and the build demands BASELINE.web gain audio.volume — for displays that cannot have the fix until this very release reaches them. Tagging a release should not be able to change what the release is allowed to contain. A baseline describes an UN-UPDATED display, so the source it is judged against is the release BEFORE the one being cut. Skip any tag pointing at HEAD and use its predecessor: v1.9.30 here, and the newest tag as before during ordinary development. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014skWYXJUWhF73EvNPgB2AS |
||
|
ScreenTinker
|
89cdd1052a |
CI: give the parity baselines the tags they judge against
main has been red since
|
||
|
ScreenTinker
|
b4363d8d26 |
Keep display.power on the Android baseline
screen_off blanks a fielded panel for real (owner/admin FORCE_LOCK, else the accessibility lock); screen_on is a logged no-op. One capability renders both dashboard buttons, so withholding the pair to hide the dead ON button also takes blank-at-night — the half that gets scheduled — away from every panel that has not updated. Panels that have updated declare for themselves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uaeo9MvzKoyXuN6ZsbhtkL |
||
|
ScreenTinker
|
4f7b4e3989 |
Judge capability baselines against the SHIPPED source, not the working tree
Two tests disagreed after the QA merges, and both were right about their own half — which is what made the disagreement worth resolving rather than silencing. A baseline describes what an UN-UPDATED display can do. The baselines were justified against `git show v1.9.28:<source>` and then asserted against the working tree, so the moment a player's payload bug was fixed the biconditional demanded a baseline change for displays that cannot possibly have the fix yet. A baseline entry moves when a fix SHIPS. It now reads the newest release tag, and falls back to the tree when tags are unavailable (a shallow CI clone), because a missing tag is a worse reason to fail a build than a slightly-early assertion. While fixing it the helper threw a ReferenceError — the require was missing — and its own broad catch swallowed it and quietly compared against the working tree anyway. The catch now rethrows ReferenceError and TypeError. A fallback that hides a programming error is the same failure shape as everything else this QA pass found. The BrightSign assertion encoded the older, more generous baseline: reboot needs the BrightScript host bridge, and an undeclared unit is precisely the one we cannot know has it. What that test is really pinning is that the row still classifies as brightsign rather than decaying to `web` — so it now asserts that, plus the video playback that is genuinely safe to assume. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uaeo9MvzKoyXuN6ZsbhtkL |
||
|
ScreenTinker
|
c1270599c3 |
Make the parity matrix true, and stop three controls that do nothing
The parity doc and the capability model had drifted from the players in both
directions, and nothing failed when they did. Auditing all four players against
their shipped sources turned up three controls a customer can press today that
change nothing, and a set of baselines that were partly too generous and partly
too stingy.
The three dead controls:
- The volume slider works on Android only. The dashboard sends set_volume as
{ level: 0..1 }; the web player reads payload.value and Tizen reads
payload.value ?? payload.volume, so on both the number is undefined and the
handler quietly declines. Three complete, working volume implementations
that cannot be driven. The fix is one line in each player and belongs to
those files; audio.volume is out of the web and brightsign baselines until
it lands, held there by a biconditional test that fails the moment a player
starts reading `level`.
- Every #161 Tier-2 command was refused for the entire fleet. lock_now,
power_menu, status_bar, block_uninstall and unblock_uninstall were gated on
system.device_owner, which no player declares and no baseline grants, so
supports() was false everywhere -- including on the device-owner panels the
feature was built for. The dashboard still drew the buttons because it also
gates on device.tier === 2. Fixed here: those five now accept
system.device_owner OR system.kiosk, which PlayerCapabilities.kt declares
under `if (isOwner)` and nothing else, and which no non-Android player
declares. Android should declare system.device_owner and retire the
stand-in.
- enable_system_capture required the capability it creates. It raises the
MediaProjection consent dialog -- the way a panel GAINS capture -- and was
gated on remote.screenshot, so the only panel that needs it was the one
panel that could not be sent it. Now ungated. The dashboard still hides the
button behind the same check; that half is a frontend change.
The baselines describe what an un-updated fielded display can do, and since
v1.9.29 is the first build in which any player declares anything, that means
v1.9.28. Every entry is now justified against `git show v1.9.28:<source>`:
- android loses display.power (v1.9.28 answers screen_on with a logged no-op,
so the ON half is dead on every fielded panel and one capability renders
both buttons) and system.reboot (owner-only; off-owner it paints an
accessibility power dialog over the signage). Scheduled reboots now skip
undeclared Android panels rather than logging a reboot that never happened,
which is the reason that gate exists.
- tizen gains display.power: v1.9.28 implements both halves with no signing
and no panel API, so withholding it hid a working control.
- brightsign loses audio.volume, display.power, system.reboot,
system.restart_player and offline.cache. All need a host bridge the unit is
not known to have, and restart_player without one is the page reload that
darkened a panel on 2026-07-28.
Also found, not fixed here because the files belong to others:
st-bridge.js computeCapabilities() is dead code -- nothing calls BS.capabilities()
-- and its 199 lines of passing tests constrain nothing a BrightSign actually
declares; the two disagree on six capabilities and the bridge is right about
most of them. BrightSign's "Force update" button is dead. PlayerCapabilities.kt
under-declares display.brightness.
The new test reads the player sources rather than the table: a dead-button rule
(every gated command has a branch somewhere), an unreachable-capability rule
(which would have caught system.device_owner), and biconditionals so a fix in a
player fails the test until the baseline follows. Claims that need hardware --
CEC reaching a display, a widget being allowed a service worker, SyncManager
holding frame lock -- are marked unverifiable in the document instead of
asserted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uaeo9MvzKoyXuN6ZsbhtkL
|