A customer blocked a screen once to see what the button did, then spent an evening
unable to get it back. Three separate faults stacked up.
1. Unblock did not stick. applyToDevice() restores `blocked` on re-pair — deliberately,
so a block cannot be shrugged off by deleting the device — which makes the SAVED copy
the real authority. Unblock only ever wrote `devices`, so the saved row stayed 1 and the
next delete + re-pair silently re-blocked. There was no way out from the dashboard at
all: unblock, re-pair, refused, repeat. Block and unblock now both mirror to the saved
copy, so the survives-a-re-pair property is deliberate rather than a leftover.
2. The refusal was invisible. handleServerRejection() clears credentials and calls
onUnpaired, but only ProvisioningActivity ever assigned that callback — and it is long
gone by the time playback is running. So the screen sat on "Connecting to server" and
the player eventually blamed the URL, sending the operator off checking their network
while the server had already said exactly what was wrong. MainActivity now handles it.
(This half was mine: clearing those leaked callbacks to stop the relaunch loop removed
the only thing that surfaced a rejection. It was a broken path — it fired into a
destroyed Activity — but it was the only one, and MainActivity should have owned it.)
3. The reason was thrown away. The server sends device:auth-error {error: "Device
blocked"} and the client discarded it. It is kept now, and a blocked screen says so
instead of implying a network fault. Localised in all six languages, matching the other
on-screen status strings.
Also ran on prod: one stale saved block cleared (fingerprint ef6540376599, the reporter's
tablet), DB backed up first. It was the only such row.
Tests pin both directions, because the two are easy to confuse: unblock must clear the
saved copy, AND a genuine block must still survive a delete + re-pair.
3159f94107