mirror of
https://github.com/screentinker/screentinker.git
synced 2026-08-13 22:03:13 -06:00
792013e36c
The auth limiters are app.use middleware that return 429 before the handler that writes activity_log, so a rejection left no trace anywhere — the limit suppressed the record of itself. Four production IPs sit at exactly ten logins a minute and there was no way to tell whether that is one attacker or an office whose staff share an egress address, which is the difference between the limiter working and the limiter locking out customers. The rejection count does not answer that. The number of distinct accounts per IP does: one account hammered is the limiter doing its job, several accounts each denied a few times is a shared egress. Both are now recorded, and a platform-admin-only endpoint reads the tally back. Identifiers are salted-hashed with a per-process salt and only ever counted, so this cannot accumulate into a roster of a customer's addresses. Memory is bounded per key and overall, and says when a count was capped rather than silently undercounting. Behaviour is unchanged: same status, same body, and the recording is wrapped so telemetry can never break the limiter. A test asserts ten through then 429 with the identical response shape, since a diagnostic that alters what it measures is worse than none. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uaeo9MvzKoyXuN6ZsbhtkL |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| config | ||
| db | ||
| lib | ||
| middleware | ||
| player | ||
| routes | ||
| scripts | ||
| services | ||
| test | ||
| ws | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| config.js | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| package.json | ||
| server.js | ||
| version.js | ||