screentinker/server/test/image-ops.test.js

'use strict';

// Image decoding is pure JavaScript now (no native sharp), so its CPU cost lands on whichever
// thread runs it — ~1s of solid work for a 12MP photo. In-process that is a stalled event loop:
// no heartbeats, no socket traffic, panels marked offline, reconnect churn — #240 arriving from
// our own thumbnail backfill. lib/image-ops therefore hosts the work on a worker thread, and
// these bites pin the properties that makes it safe, none of which a functional test would catch.

const { test, after } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const os = require('node:os');
const path = require('node:path');
const sharp = require('sharp');            // devDependency: fixture generator only, never shipped
const imageOps = require('../lib/image-ops');

const tmp = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'image-ops-'));
after(async () => { await imageOps.shutdown(); fs.rmSync(tmp, { recursive: true, force: true }); });

// 12MP — a phone photo, and the size the thresholds below are calibrated against. Smaller is
// tempting for test speed but defeats the point: at 4MP the inline path stalls only ~350ms, which
// slips under any threshold loose enough not to be flaky, so the guard stops detecting the very
// regression it exists for. Measured: inline ~1000ms stall / ~2 timers serviced, worker ~0ms / ~90.
async function bigPhoto(name = 'big.jpg') {
  const p = path.join(tmp, name);
  if (!fs.existsSync(p)) {
    // Random pixels, not a flat fill: a solid colour compresses to almost nothing and decodes far
    // faster than any real photo, which would quietly defeat the timing assertion below.
    const px = Buffer.allocUnsafe(4000 * 3000 * 3);
    for (let i = 0; i < px.length; i++) px[i] = (i * 2654435761) & 0xff;
    fs.writeFileSync(p, await sharp(px, { raw: { width: 4000, height: 3000, channels: 3 } }).jpeg().toBuffer());
  }
  return p;
}

test('image work does not stall the event loop (#240)', async () => {
  const src = await bigPhoto();

  let ticks = 0, worstGap = 0, last = Date.now();
  const timer = setInterval(() => { ticks++; worstGap = Math.max(worstGap, Date.now() - last - 10); last = Date.now(); }, 10);
  const started = Date.now();
  await imageOps.writeThumbnail(src, path.join(tmp, 'thumb.jpg'), 320, 70);
  const elapsed = Date.now() - started;
  clearInterval(timer);

  // The point is not that it was fast — it is that the loop kept running while it was slow.
  // Thresholds sit in the gap between the two behaviours (worker ~90 ticks / ~0ms stall, inline
  // ~2 ticks / ~1000ms stall), far enough from both to bite without being flaky.
  assert.ok(ticks >= 20, `event loop serviced only ${ticks} timers in ${elapsed}ms — it is being blocked`);
  assert.ok(worstGap < 200, `event loop stalled ${worstGap}ms in one go — image work is on the main thread`);
  assert.ok(fs.existsSync(path.join(tmp, 'thumb.jpg')), 'thumbnail was still written');
});

test('an undecodable image rejects without killing the worker', async () => {
  const bad = path.join(tmp, 'corrupt.jpg');
  fs.writeFileSync(bad, Buffer.from('not an image'));
  await assert.rejects(() => imageOps.metadata(bad), 'corrupt input must reject, so ingest records nulls');

  // Crash isolation: one bad upload must not take out the queued work of unrelated callers.
  const ok = path.join(tmp, 'fine.png');
  fs.writeFileSync(ok, await sharp({ create: { width: 40, height: 25, channels: 3, background: '#123456' } }).png().toBuffer());
  assert.deepEqual(await imageOps.metadata(ok), { width: 40, height: 25, orientation: 1 });
});

test('concurrent callers are serialized, and each still gets its own answer', async () => {
  // Serialization bounds peak memory to ONE decoded bitmap (a 12MP photo is ~48MB of RGBA);
  // overlapping jobs would multiply that by the queue depth on exactly the small targets this
  // change exists to reach. Correctness under concurrency is what is asserted here.
  const sizes = [[30, 10], [60, 20], [90, 30], [120, 40]];
  const files = await Promise.all(sizes.map(async ([w, h], i) => {
    const p = path.join(tmp, `c${i}.png`);
    fs.writeFileSync(p, await sharp({ create: { width: w, height: h, channels: 3, background: '#0a0' } }).png().toBuffer());
    return p;
  }));
  const got = await Promise.all(files.map(f => imageOps.metadata(f)));
  assert.deepEqual(got.map(m => [m.width, m.height]), sizes, 'replies must not be crossed between queued jobs');
});

test('#170 EXIF orientation is applied by the decoder, so dimensions are as DISPLAYED', async () => {
  // orientation 6 = "rotate 90° CW to display": a 30x100 stored buffer DISPLAYS as 100x30.
  const p = path.join(tmp, 'rot6.jpg');
  fs.writeFileSync(p, await sharp({ create: { width: 30, height: 100, channels: 3, background: '#00ff00' } })
    .withMetadata({ orientation: 6 }).jpeg().toBuffer());

  const meta = await imageOps.metadata(p);
  assert.equal(meta.width, 100, 'EXIF-rotated image measures as displayed, not as stored');
  assert.equal(meta.height, 30);
  // Reported as 1 because the rotation is already applied — imageDisplayDims() must NOT swap again.
  assert.equal(meta.orientation, 1, 'a tag of 6 here would double-rotate downstream');
});